Second Amendment Interpretation

The interpretation of the Second Amendment has changed drastically since 1791. The 2nd Amendment has frequently been interpreted to imply that only militias have a right to bear arms. Additionally, it has been said that militias are collective in nature (such as the Army National Guard) and thus are distinctly different than individuals. Good sources for help in interpretation of this seemingly complex amendment (27 words and 3 commas) are always available: for example, the actual co-author of the Second Amendment, George Mason, once said, “I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.” Mahatma Gandhi agreed, arguing that, “Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest.” Let’s ask Penn and Teller what they think of those that interpret the Second Amendment to not be an individual right…

This entry was posted in Gun Politics, Just For Fun, Uncategorized, YouTube. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s